On Friday, our
group visited the United Nations Vienna Office where we got a brief tour of the
grounds and attended lectures on international trade and the environment. Particularly,
we were fascinated by the lecture done by the United Nations Commission on
International Trade (UNCITRAL). This intergovernmental body, with universal
membership, is core legal body of the UN system in the field of private
international trade and commercial law. Their mandate is the harmonization and
modernization of international trade law by drafting model laws that help
facilitate trade.
One of the
interesting aspects that we learnt about was how long the overall process of
drafting model laws takes. With only twelve lawyers on staff and only having
meetings once or twice a year, the process of creating these laws may be
hindered by limited resources and miscommunications. We see that UNCITRAL is
vital to countries and businesses, because without it there would not be
uniform rules, certainty, dispute resolutions, lower costs, and the increased
need for coordination. We see UNCITRAL working to solve and reduce these issues
through their intergovernmental platform. Further to that, UNCITRAL coordinates
its efforts with the WTO and the ICC to further ensure harmonization of all
rules and regulations surrounding international trade.
There are
risks to globalization, but we view UNCITRAL as an organization that has and
will continue to help mitigate these risks. The question we have for you guys
is do you think that there are redundancies in having the WTO and UNCITRAL
develop rules for trade? Would it be more efficient to just have one body that
drafts law and resolves disputes?
-Stephanie & Michael

No comments:
Post a Comment